Well, okay. . . .
My first thought: yay, it's a Singer!
Second thought: nice wrapping on the cord. Firm and still intact; has probably withstood the test of time better than today's electrical tape would've.
Third thought: that's not a 110 plug.
I can only assume I wanted her for her body, because that square head (on the machine, not the plug) is a silhouette I didn't have in my collection. The Victorian decal was new to me too.
Some cursory inspection showed the shuttle was present (whew!)
A look at the back confirmed that this was a machine wired for Europe/UK.
The round cap to the right of the label holds in the motor's carbon brush. |
The motor isn't securely attached and kind of flops around right now. I suspect this old girl started as a foot-driven machine but was retro-fitted with this electric monstrosity. She might fit quite nicely into my treadle base. When I poke around more thoroughly I'll see if replacing this with a 110 motor might be feasible too.
I could go online to find her specs, but I have a fun Singer guide that walks me through identifying models based on their characteristics (printed out so it fits in a binder. I'm very analog, but the online version is fast and links to additional information about your machine.) I'm flipping that open now.Question one: Are the slide and needle plates very thin and positioned to form a cross?
If No: While facing your machine as if you were going to sew, where is the Tension Adjustment Dial/Knob? (Front or on side?)
If Front: Does your machine have a set of typewriter-like keys on the top of the arm? (No, but I'd love to see one of those in person!)
If No: Does your machine have a large Knob/Dial in the middle of the arm?
If No: Are the Slide and Needle Plates a) 1 square plate that slides to the left of a D-shaped needle plate, or b) 1 square plate that slides to the left of a rectangular needle plate, or c) 2 narrow slide plates that slide front & back.
If C: You have either the Model Series 27/28 or 127/128. Is the bobbin winder a) up and near the hand wheel or b) down by the bed?
If Down: You have a Model 27 or 28 or one of their variations such as the 28K.
The full-sized model (27) has a 14"-15" bed, and the 28 is a 3/4-sized model with a 12"-13" bed. Stepping away to measure that . . .
. . . and it appears I have a Model 28.
Now I'll go online and use this to get more information:
Okay, she's a 28K, definitely an antique, and one of a quarter of a million made in 1908. While looking for her decal (also on the ISMACS site), I found an second possibility for her power: a hand crank.
This looks exactly like her base/case, and makes much more sense. |
Final thought: that bent clasp is the least of my problems right now!
While I can't sew with her yet, this has been a good process for documenting my machines for future reference. Taxes are due within the week so my mind and energy are focused on that (times two--I'll be doing my parents' as well). Until those are done I'll put off deciding whether I want to get her up and running this month (either electrically or human-driven).
P.S. As I was putting the lid back on I realized I hadn't noticed a foot pedal. Taking the motor off (easily done--it was practically falling off anyway) and inspecting it, I couldn't see any evidence that a foot pedal had ever been wired to it. I wonder how the original owner sewed with this!
Mine was hand cranked, I thought the shuttle winder was an incredible piece of engineering but I can't say that I used it much. Have fun with the taxes, it's not a job that I miss (here if you have simple income then it's calculated for you and they tell you the answer but without showing their workings)
ReplyDeleteThat's a major suspension of disbelief, yet having been a government employee I have to keep reminding myself that they're waking up intending to do their best every day, just as anyone/everyone does.
DeleteI ordered a crank attachment last night (for under $30, it's worth playing with) and will see how that changes the game. The shuttle winder seems to stay permanently against the handwheel, running continuously (when the rubber O-ring is fresh, that is), but that doesn't seem an efficient way of planning things. I'll have to research further when I get this girl up and running.
C
My Singer red-eye treadle IDs at 1908, if I recall correctly.
ReplyDeleteI'm pretty sure mine does too (sure, I could get up from my comfy recliner and do the legwork, but why?) There must've been an industrial revolution re sewing machines around that time!
DeleteC